logo

Tehran:

Farvardin 31/ 1402





Tehran Weather:
 facebooktwitteremail
 
We must always take sides. Nutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented -- Elie Wiesel
 
Happy Birthday To:
Joan Johnson,  
 
Home Passport and Visa Forms U.S. Immigrations Birthday Registration
 

Iran's China option - -

By Roger Cohen

Op-Ed Columnist

Iran’s China Option

Published: February 8, 2009

TEHRAN

""
Earl Wilson/The New York Times

Roger Cohen

Related

Times Topics: Iran

Readers' Comments

What Iran fears most is a Gorbachev figure, somebody from within the regime who in the name of compromise with the West ends up selling out the revolution and destroying its edifice.

The jostling ahead of the June 12 presidential election — the world’s most important since America’s — must be viewed through this prism. The core debate is: can Iran manage a Chinese-style reform where its Islamic hierarchy endures through change, or does opening to America equal Soviet-style implosion?

The “Death to America” chants at rallies, twinned with a punchy “Death to Israel,” seem answer enough. The regime will stick to the game it knows. But Iran is rarely what it seems. It goes out of its way to mask its sophistication.

Jahangir Amirhusseini, a veteran lawyer once imprisoned by the mullahs, told me, “To create trust, deception is necessary.” He was serious. What he meant was politics is about artful gambits; the U.S. has favored the sledgehammer.

This has proved a lousy instrument. Iranian ascendancy has coincided with American difficulty. Under President Obama, U.S. policy toward Iran should be rooted in convincing Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader, that the price of engagement is not extinction.

Herein lies the key to the Persian theocracy over which Khamenei presides.

But his rule is less than absolute. Khamenei is the largest minority shareholder (albeit one with God-given preferred stock) in a system where repression and hard-won freedoms vie, as do authoritarianism and democracy.

Which brings us to the critical June election and former President Mohammad Khatami, the reformist once seen as Iran’s Gorbachev-in-waiting. He wasn’t. His 1997-2005 presidency left many Iranians disappointed. At the breach, he retreated. Student protests in 1999 and 2003 died before gaining traction.

Still, liberalizing economic reform and dialogue were as much the Khatami hallmark as bombastic mismanagement has been that of his successor, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. As tumbling oil compounds the cost of Ahmadinejad’s crony-rewarding profligacy, and Iranians wonder where on earth (or beyond) the billions went, the announcement Sunday of Khatami’s candidacy galvanized the race.

Khatami laid to rest days of rumors by saying Iran’s “historical demand for freedom, independence and justice” obliged him to run. It was significant that he placed freedom, an unfulfilled promise of the shah-toppling revolution, first.

His chief opponent will be the incumbent, Ahmadinejad, who remains the favorite. The president’s success in projecting Iran as the voice of the world’s disinherited, his fast-forwarding of the nuclear program and his popular touch have impressed Khamenei.

But the impetuosity that has made Ahmadinejad the Unidentified Flying Object of global politics has given the guardian of the revolution — and many millions of voters — pause.

One theory holds that Ahmadinejad would favor Iranian glasnost in response to Obama because he believes it’s not Iranian theocracy that would collapse, but America! He’s been swayed by signs of capitalism following Communi



    
Copyright © 1998 - 2024 by IranANDWorld.Com. All rights reserved.