Barack Obama made news Sunday on ABCs This Week: The White House dog will likely be a Labradoodle or a Portuguese water dog.
![""]("http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/03/12/opinion/kristol-190a.jpg")
William Kristol
Readers' Comments
Share your thoughts.
Ive got to say Im a little disappointed. These are nice, friendly, generally obedient breeds (or in the case of the Labradoodle, a crossbreed). But what a missed opportunity! Obama could have made a bolder, edgier choice, like a mini-Australian shepherd. I happen to know one well. Hes very smart, a bit neurotic, devoted to his master (if sometimes confused about whether he or the master is the master), and always looking for people to herd. A mini-Aussie would have fit right into a White House populated by Rahm Emanuel, Larry Summers, Joe Biden et al. Instead, Obamas going with a no-drama canine alternative.
And he seems to be going for the no-dramatic-change-in-policy-in-the-White-House alternative as well. Consider Obamas reaction when George Stephanopoulos played a clip of Dick Cheney counseling Obama not to implement his campaign rhetoric until hes fully briefed on the details of the Bush administrations counterterrorism policy.
I think that was pretty good advice, which is I should know whats going on before we make judgments and that we shouldnt be making judgments on the basis of incomplete information or campaign rhetoric. So Ive got no quibble with that particular quote, said Obama. Usually, presidents pretend their campaign positions are more than campaign rhetoric. Not Obama.
Obama did note that he differs with Cheney on some things that we know happened, including waterboarding. And he did reiterate his pledge to close Guantnamo. But he warned that it was more difficult than I think a lot of people realize, explaining that while he was committed to the rule of law, he wasnt interested in releasing people who are intent on blowing us up.
And at one point he returned, unbidden, to the much-maligned vice president, commenting, I thought that Dick Cheneys advice was good.
Perhaps the president-elect was just being polite. Or perhaps he just enjoys torturing (metaphorically!) some of his previously most ardent supporters who want Dick Cheney tried as a war criminal.
In fact, Stephanopoulos asked about that. He pointed to a popular question on Obamas Web site about whether hell appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the greatest crimes of the Bush administration, including torture and warrantless wiretapping. Obama stipulated that no one should be above the law. But he praised C.I.A. employees, and said he didnt want them looking over their shoulders and lawyering. He took the general view that when it comes to national security, what we have to focus on is getting things right in the future, as opposed to looking at what we got wrong in the past.
With respect to the Middle East, Obama didnt even say wed gotten much wrong in the past. Asked by Stephanopoulos whether his policy would build on Bushs or would be a clean break, Obama answered, if you look not just at the Bush administration, but also what happened under the Clinton administration, you are seeing the general outlines of an approach. So: No break.
Meanwhile, the Obama transition teams chief national security spokeswoman, Brooke Anderson, was denying a press report that Obamas advisers were urging him to initiate low-level or clandestine contacts with Hamas as a prelude to change in policy. Anderson told The Jerusalem Post that the story wasnt accurate, and reminded one and all that Obama has repeatedly stated that he believes that Hamas is a terrorist organization dedicated to Israels destruction, and that we should not deal with them until they recognize Israel, renounce violence and abide by past agreements.