![]("http://www.foreignpolicy.com/sites/all/themes/fp/images/text_down.gif")
![]("http://www.foreignpolicy.com/sites/all/themes/fp/images/text_up.gif")
![]("http://www.foreignpolicy.com/files/images/tehran1.jpg")
If the dread visions of George Orwell pertained only to far-off lands suffering under revolutions betrayed, they might be obscure to us now. Orwell's triumph was to bridge the imaginations of East and West by setting his Soviet-inspired satires of political cruelty, control, and deception in familiar England. Animal Farm and Nineteen Eighty-Four touch truths so universal that they unsettle the citizens of established democracies. Orwell pertains everywhere, but, even in the absence of the Stalinist superpower that honed his perceptions, a handful of states continue to provide unabashed variations on the "Orwellian" -- particularly Iran.
![]("http://www.foreignpolicy.com/sites/all/modules/fpcustom/article/images/comment_bubble.gif")
!["Bookmark]("http://www.foreignpolicy.com/sites/all/modules/fpcustom/article/images/more_share.gif"){kind=small}
More... Orwell provided the world a new vocabulary for modes of oppression. When, in January, Iranian authorities pressured Café Prague, a popular hangout for Tehran's students and intellectuals, to install came