Thor Swift for The New York TimesSteven P. Jobs at a product event in 2007.When Steve Jobs resigned as the chief executive of Apple on Wednesday, his note to the public and the Apple board was short and classy. The gist was this: I have always said if there ever came a day when I could no longer meet my duties and expectations as Apples C.E.O., I would be the first to let you know. Unfortunately, that day has come.
As you can imagine, this news is rocking the world and not just the tech world. Mr. Jobs, after all, has almost single-handedly reshaped a stunning range of industries: music, TV, movies, software, cellphones, and cloud computing. The products hes shepherded into existence with single-minded vision read like a Top 10 list, or a Top 50 list, of the worlds most successful inventions: Macintosh. iPod. iPhone. iTunes. iMovie. iPad.

The Timess technology columnist, David Pogue, keeps you on top of the industry in his free, weekly e-mail newsletter.
Sign up | See Sample
Hes done pretty well for Apple stockholders, too. Ten years ago Apples stock was at $9 a share; today, its $376. Apple is neck-and-neck with Exxon Mobil for the title of worlds most valuable company.
Most of the reactions online today read like obituaries for Steve Jobs, if not for Apple.
Is that appropriate? Well, only Mr. Jobss inner circle knows how sick he actually is. (He was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in 2004, had a liver transplant in 2009 and has had health troubles ever since.) But nobody, not even Mr. Jobs, can say for sure whether Apple can still be Apple without him at the helm.
There are three reasons that it might and one big reason that it might not.
The good news: First, Mr. Jobs isnt leaving Apple. Hell remain as chairman of the Apple board. Tim Cook, whos been Apples director of operations for seven years, will take over as chief executive. (Hes been acting C.E.O. since January.)
You can bet that as chairman, Mr. Jobs will still be the godfather. Hell still be pulling plenty of strings, feeding his vision to his carefully built team, and weighing in on the companys compass headings.
Second, the tech world doesnt turn on a dime. Apples pipeline is already stuffed with at least a couple of years worth of Jobs-directed products. In the short term, you wont see any difference in Apples output of cool, popular inventions.
Third, even if Mr. Jobs isnt sitting at every design meeting, ripping apart or heartily embracing each idea presented to him, his tastes, methods and philosophies are deeply entrenched in the companys blood.
In Silicon Valley, success begets success. And at this point, few companies have as high a concentration of geniuses in technology, design and marketing as Apple. Leaders like the design god Jonathan Ive and the operations mastermind Tim Cook wont let the company go astray.
So its pretty clear that for the next few years, at least, Apple will still be Apple without Mr. Jobs as involved as hes been for years.
But despite these positive signs, theres one heck of a huge elephant in the room one unavoidable reason why its hard to imagine Apple without Mr. Jobs steering the ship: personality.
His personality made Apple Apple. Thats why no other company has ever been able to duplicate Apples success. Even when Microsoft or Google or Hewlett-Packard tried to mimic Apples every move, run its designs through the corporate copying machine, they never succeeded. And thats because they never had such a single, razor-focused, deeply opinionated, micromanaging, uncompromising, charismatic, persuasive, mind-blowingly visionary leader.
By maintaining so much control over even the smallest design decisions, by anticipating what we all wanted even before we did, by spotting the promise in new technologies when they were still prototypes, Steve Jobs ran Apple with the nimbleness of a start-up company, even as he built it into one of the worlds biggest enterprises.
I believe Apples brightest and most innovative days are ahead of it, Mr. Jobs wrote in his resignation letter.
Thats a wonderful endorsement. But really? Can he really mean that Apples days will be brighter and more innovative without him in the drivers seat?
Tim Cook gets rave reviews as an executive and numbers guy. But is he a Jobs-style visionary? Does he have Jobs-style charisma? Does he have a Jobsian reality distortion field? Before the iTunes Store opened, would he have been able to convince the record companies to sell their music for $1 a song? In 2005, would he have had the force of personality to make Cingular redesign its voice-mail system for the iPhones visual voice mail? In 2009, would he have been able to cow AT&T into offering a no-contract-required, month-at-a-time data plan for the iPad?
Will he have the crazy confidence to kill off technologies he sees as dying, as Mr. Jobs has over and over again (floppy drive, dial-up modem, and, in Mac OS X Lion, even faxing)?
Does he know where the puck of public taste will come to rest two years from now? Five years from now?
Theres an awful lot of Steve Jobs in Apple, and an incredible amount of talent at its Cupertino headquarters. So no matter what happens, Apple will not slowly sink into a directionless, uncharacterizable, spread-thin blob like, say, Yahoo or Hewlett-Packard or Microsoft.
But what will happen when Mr. Jobss pipeline is no longer full, and when his difficult, brilliant, charismatic, future-shaping personality is no longer the face of Apple?
Its hard to imagine that well ever see another 15 years of blockbuster, culture-changing hits like the iMac, iPod, iPhone and iPad from Apple or anyone else. And thats really, really sad.
Thank you, Mr. Jobs, for an incredible run. The worlds of culture, media and technology have never seen anything like you.
In your new role, we wish you health, rest and happiness and, whenever you feel up to it, the opportunity to let Apple know where the puck will come to rest.



